LJCPA Trustee Meeting 10/6/2022 Materials & Comments

The videoconference for the LJCPA meeting goes live around 5:30 pm, so that participants can make sure their video and/or audio are working. The Chair calls the meeting to order at 6pm. Registration is necessary to attend the meeting: please visit https://lajollacpa.org/ljcpa-online-meeting-instructions/ for instructions. If you prefer not to identify yourself, please write to info@lajollacpa.org for instructions how to attend anonymously by phone.

This page contains links to the agenda for the meeting and materials applicants, their representatives, and interested parties submitted in connection with action items. There are no materials (beyond committee minutes) for Consent Agenda items.

Please note: Many items linked on this page are copyrighted by their creators. They are distributed or reproduced here solely for use by LJCPA and its committees in connection with community review on behalf of the City. Such materials may not be used or distributed further without explicit permission from the copyright holder.

If you have comments on these or other agenda items, please submit them using the “Reply” form at the foot of this page (following the list of recent comments).

Agenda

Minutes

Projects & Action Items

  • 7788/7798 Prospect Pl “Nilforoushan Residence” (1058871, Lyon/Leon) DPR 9/20: CAN, 5-0-1
  • (pulled) 2072 Via Casa Alta “Javaheri Residence” (698915, Marengo) DPR 9/20: CAN, 4-1-1
  • 1456 Nautilus St “Martin Residences” (699238, Marengo) DPR 9/20: findings CAN , 5-0-1
  • 6083 La Jolla Scenic S “Sewer Vacation” (1062291, Griswold) DPR 9/20: CAN, 4-0-2
  • Proposed Stop Signs on Drury at Pearl (Earley) T&T 9/21: APPROVE, 8-0-0
  • Valet Parking Permit for Paradisaea Restaurant (Bernal) T&T 9/21: DENY, 8-0-0

Policy Discussions

Special Event Street Closures

Approve criteria, standards, administrative protocols for requests that involve temporary street closures for special event processions for future permit applications.

T&T 8/17: APPROVE 9-0-0

Possible Responses to the new Policy 600-24 (Fitzgerald/Neil)

Discussion of two among the possible LJCPA responses to the new Policy 600-24: (1) Apply for City recognition and agree to take the actions necessary to comply with the Policy requirements and Terms and Conditions, or (2) Not apply for City recognition and continue to operate under current LJCPA policies and bylaws.

Officer Reports

New Logo for LJCPA (Baracchini)

The original artwork for LJCPA’s logo has long been lost; the only copy we have is a small digital image with resolution too coarse for most uses. The Secretary asked a local designer to propose some updated versions to replace the old log.

Committee Reports

Air Noise

CPC (LDC Updates)

Review or Submit Comments

If you submit comments below, please identify the agenda item to which they relate. Once the moderator approves them, comments will be displayed publicly, including the name you provide.

Please be as brief as possible. At a regular meeting, comments would be limited to 2 spoken minutes; that translates to between 200 and 300 written words. Please do not include URLs or links, since they may cause your comment to be flagged as spam. At her or his sole discretion, LJCPA’s moderator will reject comments that are unrelated to agenda items, or that are offensive, ad hominem, or otherwise inappropriate to reasoned discussion of the matters at hand.

Submitted Comments

1 thought on “LJCPA Trustee Meeting 10/6/2022 Materials & Comments”

  1. Lynda Christel

    Nilforoushan Project/Prospect Place. In my opinion the proposed project does not promote a positive visual transition. This project is located on a very prominent corner – a gateway entrance to La Jolla Village. The project is stark and fishbowl-like in appearance and offers little vegetation and/or trees to replace the many existing trees and shrubbery. If the LJCPA truly believes this is an acceptable project for this location, then I’m requesting serious reconsideration of the landscape design. A couple of palm trees perhaps would offset the stark visual transition currently planned. Thank you for your time.

Comments are closed.